[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I'm writing Python as if it were strongly typed, never recycling a
name to hold a type other than the original type.
If it buys you anything? Maybe for shedskin or some future
"to-native-code" compiler?
Is this good software engineering practice, or am I missing something
Pythonic?
I'd say so. In a function/method body I do reuse generic names like
data,counter,etc. but I never change say an instance variable to another
type (except from None). Principle of least surprise applies here.
cheers
Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
