En Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:23:38 -0300, Jeremy Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi. I wondered if anyone knew the rationale behind the naming of the > Popen class in the subprocess module. Popen sounds like the a suitable > name for a function that created a subprocess, but the object itself is > a subprocess, not a "popen". It seems that it would be more accurate to > just name the class Subprocess, can anyone explain why this is not the > case? I have no idea - but I agree, Subprocess would have been a better name. -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
