I am concerned by the lack of follow-through on some responses to recent ideas I have described. Do I merely have a wrong understanding of group policy? Is it a good policy (defined with respect to the future of Python and the welfare of humans at large) if so? Is there a serious lack of diligence, or should I merely take more initiative, and ignore charges of 'pestering'? (Warning, moderately deep outside social issues on table too.) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- lacking follow-through castironpi
- Re: lacking follow-through James Mills
- Re: lacking follow-through Gabriel Genellina
- Re: lacking follow-through Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
- Re: lacking follow-through castironpi
- Re: lacking follow-through Eric Wertman
- Re: lacking follow-through MRAB
- Re: lacking follow-through castironpi
- Re: lacking follow-through Dan Upton
- Re: lacking follow-through castironpi
- Re: lacking follow-through Steve Holden