Hi,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pekka Laukkanen:
...
On the other hand it has some little practical advantages, you can do:
sum(x == y for x in iterable)

That also equals to a more tidy:
sum(1 for x in iterable if x == y)

Wouldn't
len([x for x in iterable if x==y])

or even shorter:

iterable.count(y)

not work and read better anyway?

even calculating with boolean values isn't neccessary
since 'and' and 'foo if bar else blub' are working much better
so the type coalescing

bool - int - float can really go away.

Tino

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to