greg a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Nope. But IIRC, one-class-per-file helps saving on compile/link time.
A problem we don't have with dynamic languages !-)
That's mostly true. Although I've noticed that if I have
a very large .py file, it can take a noticeable number
of moments to regenerate the .pyc after I've changed
something.
Indeed - and "very large" files are a maintainance nightmare anyway.
The point was that with C++, when you edit a file, you not only have to
recompile this file, you *also* have to relink *everything* depending on
what's defined in this file. So the saving is mostly on on (re)linking
time.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
