Mike Kent wrote:
> To followup on this:
>
> Terry: Yes, I did in fact miss the 'buffer' parameter to open.
> Setting the buffer parameter to 0 did in fact fix the test code that I
> gave above, but oddly, did not fix my actual production code; it
> continues to get the data as first read, rather than what is currently
> on the disk. I'm still investigating why.
What OS is your test code one? What OS is your production code on? As
mentioned read{line} will mirror the OS's underlying stdio.
j
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
