On Nov 3, 6:51 pm, "Paulo J. Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Joe Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2008, at 4:38 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > > >> However, I wouldn't dare to say Python needs structures to be a good > >> language, or anything similar. My question was more directed to : if > >> there aren't structures in Python, what do Pythonists use instead? > > > Classes. > > ok, so that goes back to what I said on my first post. Classes with no > private fields/methods.
Technically there are no private attributes in (pure) Python so the answer is still classes. George -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
