On Nov 3, 5:38 pm, "Paulo J. Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Aaron Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 3, 3:45 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> "Paulo J. Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Take care with broad sweeping statements about "every other language", > >> or even "most other languages". They are usually flat-out wrong: > >> there is a stunning variety of different approaches and concepts in > >> programming languages, with very little common to even a majority of > >> them. > > > Yea, verily. How many languages do you think that is? Feel free to > > count C and C++ as different ones. > > Well, I wouldn't dare to say I know a lot of languages but the ones I > do provide mechanisms to define structures / records: C, C++, Scheme, > Common Lisp, Haskell, SML, Ocaml.
I don't know even half of those. What about Perl? Does anyone know that? > My question was more directed to : if > there aren't structures in Python, what do Pythonists use instead? Just a blank object, I imagine. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
