Paul McGuire: > Really? Looking at randrange, it sure seems to do a lot of work in > pursuit of handling all possible cases for specifying range > boundaries, step values, etc.
Well, randrange is the simpler thing to read and understand here, and maybe the one less likely to get wrong too. But I understand your concerns. The solution is to write a C function in the random module that implements the randrange in an efficient way. Bye, bearophile -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
