Boost.Python is difficult to understand, far more than SWIG. It may be faster, but I don't think it is worth it ATM. Binding C++ classes with SWIG is really simple.
Matthieu 2008/11/25 Olivier Grisel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/11/25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Nov 25, 4:34 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> You can't use ctypes for C++, only for C-style APIs. >>> >>> Diez >> >> With some work, you can convert your C++ objects to PyObject* and then >> return the latter in a function with C bindings. > > http://cython.org also has some support for C++ bindings. > > I also heard that Boost.Python is very well suited to make full > featured C++ / python bindings though I never tried myself. > > -- > Olivier > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Website: http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/ Blogs: http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92 LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
