Joel Hedlund <joel.hedl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I should probably do this with lists instead because I can't really > think of a way of salvaging this. Am i right? >
I think you probably are correct. The only thing I can think that might help is if you can catch all the situations where changes to the dependent values might change the hash and wrap them up: before changing the hash pop the item out of the dict, then reinsert it after the change. Alternatively give up on defining hash and __eq__ for FragmentInfo and rely on object identity instead. -- Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
