jerry.carl...@gmail.com wrote:
...
It's really just the goniometric functions that I am missing most at
the moment, so maybe I can figure it out with help of what you said
plus the already existing imperfect modules. Meantime maybe this
discussion will caught Guido's eye... ;-) And btw I do expect that
Python becomes better than Mathematica one day because it's free and
open :-) Maybe when Wolfram retires ;-) Thanks again!

I agree having full support for all math.* functions for all builtin
types would be nice.

However if you are more looking for replacement of mathematica and
friends with python you might check scipy/numpy.

Regards
Tino

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to