J. Cliff Dyer a écrit :
I want to be able to create an object of a certain subclass, depending
on the argument given to the class constructor.

I have three fields, and one might need to be a StringField, one an
IntegerField, and the last a ListField.  But I'd like my class to
delegate to the proper subclass automatically, so I can just do:

f1 = Field('abc')
f2 = Field('123')
f3 = Field('D,E,F')
f1.data
'abc'
f2.data
123
f3.data
['D','E','F']
type(f1)
<class '__main__.StringField'>
type(f2)
<class '__main__.StringField'>
type(f3)
<class '__main__.ListField'>

I've come up with a solution, but I suspect there's something cleaner I
can do with the inheritance structure of __new__.  I don't like
explicitly leapfrogging over Field.__new__ to object.__new__.

My attempt is below:

def is_list(arg):
    if ',' in arg:  return True
    else:  return False

def is_integer(arg):
    try:  int(arg)
    except ValueError:  return False
    else:  return True

class Field(object):
    def __new__(cls, a):
        if is_list(a):
            return ListField(a)
        elif is_integer(a):
            return IntegerField(a)
        else:
            return StringField(a)
def __init__(self, input):
        super(Field, self).__init__(input)
        self.data = input

class IntegerField(Field):
    def __new__(cls, a):
        return object.__new__(cls, a)
    def __init__(self, s):
        super(IntegerField, self).__init__(s)
        self.s = int(self.s)
class ListField(Field):
    def __new__(cls, a):
        return object.__new__(cls, a)
    def __init__(self, s):
        super(ListField, self).__init__(s)
        self.s = s.split(',')

class StringField(Field):
    def __new__(cls, a):
        return object.__new__(cls, a)

Is there a cleaner way to do this?  The main problem is that
Field.__new__ gets in the way of properly constructing the subclasses
once I've used it to select the proper subclass in the first place.

Not only that, but the base class should know nothing of its subclasses. As Paul suggested, a better solution would be to make Field a factory function (and rename the Field class to BaseField).

Also and FWIW, since your Field subclasses are responsible for doing the conversion, you could as well use this to find out the concrete class to use for a given value, ie (not tested):

class Field(object):
    __classes = []
    __default = None

    @classmethod
    def register(cls, subclass, is_default=False):
        if is_default:
            if cls.__default is not None:
                raise WhateverError("only one default subclass, thanks")
            cls.__default = subclass

        cls.__classes.append(subclass)

    def __new__(cls, value):
        for subclass in cls.__classes:
            try:
                return subclass(value)
            except (TypeError, ValueError):
                continue

        if cls.__default is not None:
            return cls.__default(value)

        raise ValueError("no appropriate subclass for '%s'" % value)


class BaseField(object):
    # common code here

class FloatField(BaseField):
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value = float(value)

Field.register(FloatField)

class ListField(BaseField):
    def __init__(self, value):
        if "," in value:
            self.value = value.split(",")
        raise ValueError("could not convert '%s' to a list" % value)

Field.register(ListField)

class IntegerField(BaseField):
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value = int(value)

Field.register(IntegerField)

class StringField(self, value):
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value = str(value)

Field.register(StringField, is_default=True)

Now this may just be overkill for your needs - I don't have enough context to know !-)


--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to