Benjamin J. Racine wrote:
I think it would be a good step if you could make some sensible interpretation
of a typical statement without its parentheses.
f "abc" 123
-->
f( "abc", 123 )
It would be just the thing in a couple of situations... though it does conflict with raw-string
literals as stated: r"abc"... which if you left open, would be susceptible to a local
definition of r!. Maybe you could put it after, like numeric literals: 123L, "abc"r,
which is not bad.
Surely this would require that
f( "abc", 123 )
-->
f(("abc", 123))
Or would you require that tuple-formation is "special"?
--Scott David Daniels
scott.dani...@acm.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
