Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
"Scott David Daniels" <s......@acm.org> wrote:

You might enjoy looking at QNX, since I think it is built along the
lines you are describing here.  I have an ancient copy of their OS,
but haven't followed for more than couple of decades.

I vaguely know about it, and I know they claim to be hot on real time stuff. I have never pursued it in any depth because
of the real tiny nature of the processors I have been working
with (8031).

When I had a cursory look at it a long time ago, it seemed
to be almost unix like in its make up, and I doubted that
I could persuade it to run on of them. (I may be dead wrong of course - I don't know)

I will put it on my list of stuff to try to get done.

Slightly OT: QNX was open-sourced, at least for non-commercial use, a little more that a year ago. So it might be worth a new look.

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to