On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM, mk <mrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (duck) > > 542 comp.lang.python rtfm > > 467 comp.lang.python shut+up > > 263 comp.lang.perl rtfm > > 45 comp.lang.perl shut+up > But over how many messages for each group? Wouldn't the percentage of messages containing those be more interesting than the raw number? ;p -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? mk
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Dan Upton
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Tim Rowe
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Tim Chase
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Tim Rowe
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Dan Upton
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Terry Reedy
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Mensanator
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Steve Holden
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Hendrik van Rooyen
- Re: Is c.l.py becoming less friendly? Mark Dickinson