On Feb 16, 4:07 pm, Gustavo Narea <m...@gustavonarea.net> wrote: > But the problem is that it is broken. > > That decorator is for controller actions in Pylons-powered web > applications (which are instance methods). Pylons inspects the > action's signature to find what parameters it's going to pass to its > instance method, which fails because my current decorator changes the > signature.
Yes, I am saying don't mess with the internal mechanism of Pylons and leave it as it was. Or was it broken from the beginning? The only reason I see for you to touch those things is if you are a Pylons core developer. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
