On Feb 24, 9:24 pm, John Machin <sjmac...@lexicon.net> wrote: > On Feb 25, 4:48 am, mathieu <mathieu.malate...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I did not know where to report that: > > > 'u' Obselete type – it is identical to 'd'. (7) > > >http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting > > So what's your problem with that? Do you believe that 'u' is not > accepted? That 'u' is not identical to 'd' and thus the doc should be > rewritten as "its behaviour is identical to that of 'd'"? That the > behaviour of 'u' is NOT identical to that of 'd'? That 'u' should not > be documented? That 'u' should not be described as obselete? ^^^^^^^^
lol :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
