On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:39:16 -0000, Scott David Daniels <scott.dani...@acm.org> wrote:

The original proposal was initially appealing to me until I saw this
comment.  That means a relatively "invisible typo" would turn into good
syntax.  Possibley this is exactly what Rhodri James is talking about,
but just to be explicit, one of these is probably a mistake:
        somefun(something, key(x)==5)
        somefun(something, key(x)=5)
Right now a syntax error makes you look there, after your extension,
only test cases will show these problems.

Oo, no, I'd missed that!  Good catch.


--
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeeste Herder to the Masses
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to