On 17 Mrz., 16:22, Mudcat <mnati...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 17, 6:39 am, Kay Schluehr <kay.schlu...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > > On 16 Mrz., 23:06, Mudcat <mnati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 13, 8:37 pm, Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> wrote: > > > > > Chris Rebert wrote: > > > > > Haven't used it, butPythonfor .NET sounds like it might be what you > > > > > want:http://pythonnet.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > I've done some development for and with PythonDotNET. It's definitely > > > > the right thing. It works with .NET, Mono andPython2.4 to 2.6. > > > > > Christian > > > > That looks exactly like what I'm searching for. I'll give it a shot. > > > > One question, the last update for that is back in '07. Do you know if > > > it's still in active development? > > > > Thanks > > > Don't think it's maintained right now. But be aware that it runs well > > for the current CLR 2.0. > > > For using .NET 3.5 features you just have to add > > > c:\Program Files\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\v3.5\ > > > to your Python path and add assemblies with clr.AddReference as > > convenient. > > Based on the archived emails I know that it can work on Python 2.6, > but it's not clear what modifications are necessary. I downloaded the > source files to run independently, and that was capable of running > with installs of Python 2.4 and 2.5.
> If I download the installer will > it automatically recognize 2.6, or will I need to change paths and > possibly re-compile? > > Thanks You'll have to change the BUILD option in the project settings of the Python.Runtime assembly. There is already a conditional compilation switch for Python 2.6 available in the source. So after this has been done it will build pythonnet for Python 2.6. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list