In article <000045bd$0$2191$c3e8...@news.astraweb.com>, David George <d...@eatmyhat.co.uk> wrote: > >Thanks to everybody for helping me with this matter, but eventually >i've had to settle for a simpler and probably far less elegant solution >due to time constraints. > >It seems that SocketServer.py in 2.6 doesn't directly rely on anything >that's in Python 2.6, so i've simply copied the code across and i'm >using it in place of the version built into Python 2.5.
That's actually a reasonably elegant solution! -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Programming language design is not a rational science. Most reasoning about it is at best rationalization of gut feelings, and at worst plain wrong." --GvR, python-ideas, 2009-3-1 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
