On Mar 28, 11:41 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: > In article <2d80ec1b-5eb5-4e82-9a4a-36934dd53...@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, > Aaron Brady <castiro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >A week ago, I posted a question and an idea about Python's garbage > >collector. I got a few replies. Some days later, I posted a mock-up > >implementation of it, and got *NO* replies. Does this mean: > > >a) It works > >b) It doesn't work > >c) It's not particularly applicable to Python at that point > >(particularly) > >d) It's not news > > e) the best place to start these days with actual implementations of > ideas is the python-ideas list
I'm not convinced I'm altogether welcome there. I treated that list as a social list for some time, not discovering its intensity until after estranging everybody. Not to mention, I'm not primarily proposing this idea as an improvement to the reference management; it's an idea I would probably implement on the side, for an extension. I just want to know if it's valid and functional. Should I ask about it on comp.programming? Am I in the right place? Or, is my idea sophisticated and relevant enough to test the waters again? > "At Resolver we've found it useful to short-circuit any doubt and just > refer to comments in code as 'lies'. :-)" > --Michael Foord paraphrases Christian Muirhead on python-dev, 2009-3-22 P.S. No one read your sig or liked it. P.P.S. Ok, not bad. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
