On 3/29/2009 6:50 PM Rhodri James apparently wrote:
In this case, your choice of wording (the nearest thing we have in print to "tone of voice") did not inspire me to go digging around in source that you have just as easy access to, in order to answer questions that I'm not particularly interested in.
I certainly was not trying to inspire you to do so. The question was meant for people who had this level of understanding already, or who already knew with some specificity where I might dig. Since you did not address my question about the nuance of "magic", I'm inclined to treat you as a "no" vote. Thanks, Alan Isaac -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
