On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:30:20 -0700, Aahz wrote: > In article > <37d39064-b73d-4e47-9e1e-d07c14bfc...@z8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, > alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> wrote: >>On Apr 21, 1:18 pm, Tim Wintle <tim.win...@teamrubber.com> wrote: >>> >>> There was some suggestion about introducing synonyms that followed >>> PEP8 and introducing deprecation warnings as you suggested, but I >>> can't remember the outcome. I'd suggest checking the dev archives. >> >>What about the possibility of offering an additional, PEP8-compliant API >>for each? >> >> import logging # the current interface import logging.pep8 # the >> PEP8-compliant interface >> >>I'd be happy to contribute to this if it was considered worthwhile. > > That's precisely what's been vetoed (among other things). Guido thinks > the maintenance cost is too high.
But there's nothing to stop somebody from putting such a PEP-8 compliant library on PyPi. If people prefer it to the standard library, I'm sure Guido will change his mind. http://pypi.python.org/ -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list