kj wrote:
... I can't come with an example in which the same couldn't be
accomplished with
try:
# do something
# do something else
except ...:
# handle exception
The only significant difference I can come up with is that in the
second form, the except clause may be masking some unexpected
exceptions from the "do something else" part. Is this the rationale
behind this else clause? Or is there something more to it?
Yes, in a way. The idea of catching particular exceptions is to only
handle exceptions you expect (let the others go out to more general
reporters). So, not only should you choose the tightest exception to
catch that you can, but you should look for it in a very narrow window:
exactly where you expect it.
try:
v = mumble.field
except AttributeError:
pass
else:
sys.warning('field was actually there?')
as opposed to:
try:
v = mumble.field
sys.warning('field was actually there?')
except AttributeError:
pass
The idea is to make it clear what you expect might go
wrong that you are prepared to handle.
--Scott David Daniels
scott.dani...@acm.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
