On 17 May, 13:05, jer...@martinfamily.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
> From a user point of view I think that adding a 'par' construct to
> Python for parallel loops would add a lot of power and simplicity,
> e.g.
>
> par i in list:
> updatePartition(i)
>
...actually, thinking about this further, I think it would be good to
add a 'sync' keyword which causes a thread rendezvous within a
parallel loop. This would allow parallel loops to run for longer in
certain circumstances without having the overhead of stopping and
restarting all the threads, e.g.
par i in list:
for j in iterations:
updatePartion(i)
sync
commitBoundaryValues(i)
sync
This example is a typical iteration over a grid, e.g. finite elements,
calculation, where the boundary values need to be read by neighbouring
partitions before they are updated. It assumes that the new values of
the boundary values are stored in temporary variables until they can
be safely updated.
Jeremy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
