On 2009-06-08 14:32, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Robert Kern<robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2009-06-08 07:44, Skip Montanaro wrote:
On Jun 5, 1:39 pm, joep<josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there a way to ban spammers from pypi?
Can you provide some examples? It's possible that we can apply
SpamBayes
to PyPI submissions in much the same way that we apply it in other non-
mail
areas.
I suspect he might talking about all of the "1.0.1" releases of projects on
June 5th from "v y p e r l o g i x . c o m" or "p y p i . i n f o"
(obfuscated to avoid helping them out). Most of them appear to be removed,
now. These chuckleheads even have a blog post complaining about it. I can
collect a list from my Cheeseshop RSS history if you like.
I don't think a SpamBayes approach will work for this particular guy. It's
not like completely fake metadata was uploaded with links to spam sites.
There actually is Python code for some of them. Maybe even some that is
marginally useful. But only marginally (Linked Lists for Python? Really?).
All of the code appears to use their proprietary, unreleased package.
None of the code was useful, and I swear it all seemed like one giant
ruse to bump google rankings for his pay-for-play sites and downloads.
It was all just series of URLs back linking to his crap-sites.
Come now! I'm sure pyLotto has some measurable (but tiny!) amount of expected
value to it. :-)
The main point is that the code isn't gibberish. It might even do what it claims
to do if one had the dependencies. Only a human examining it could determine
that the code was actually useless and part of a spam-like campaign.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
