masher <vertesp...@gmail.com> writes: > On Jul 2, 12:06 pm, J Kenneth King <ja...@agentultra.com> wrote: >> masher <vertesp...@gmail.com> writes: >> > My questions, then, is: Is there a more elegant/pythonic way of doing >> > what I am trying to do with the current Pool class? >> >> Forgive me, I may not fully understand what you are trying to do here >> (I've never really used multiprocessing all that much)... >> >> But couldn't you just assign your own Queue object to the Pool instance? > > That's basically my question. It does not appear as though there is > any straightforward way of doing this because of the design of Pool's > __init__ method, which passes _taskqueue to several functions. Hence, > even if I were to reassign _taskqueue after __init__, that wouldn't > change anything.
I think I understand. There are ways to modify the class before instantiating it, but even the most clever or elegant solution will still smell funny. I suppose this might be worth submitting as a feature suggestion to the multiprocessing project. Best of luck. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
