Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
"R. C. James Harlow" wrote:
On Monday 25 April 2005 14:34, Ivan Van Laningham wrote:
"R. C. James Harlow" wrote:
or just:
for a,b,c in (tup1, tup2, tup3):
print a
print b
print c
And this works in Python version???
Ah, reading the replies to the original post, this works but doesn't give
the
result that the original poster wanted.
Define "works":
>>> a = (1,2,3)
>>> b = ('a','b','c')
>>> c = (None, 'foo', 3.14)
>>> tup1 = (1,2,3)
>>> tup2 = ('a','b','c')
>>> tup3 = (None, 'foo', 3.14)
>>> for a,b,c in (tup1,tup2,tup3):
... print a
... print b
... print c
...
1
2
3
a
b
c
None
foo
3.14
>>>
It's a valid interpretation of the OP's
ambiguously stated requirements, though probably
not the right one.
-Peter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
