Some have treated this as a troll. I don't.
r wrote:
[snip]
1.) No need to use "()" to call a function with no arguments.
Python --> "obj.m2().m3()" --ugly
Ruby --> "obj.m1.m2.m3" -- sweeet!
Man, i must admit i really like this, and your code will look so much
cleaner.
+1
2.) the .each method
container.each{|localVar| block}
This method can really cleanup some ugly for loops, although i really
like the readability of for loops.
Not clear.
3.) true OOP
Now before you go and get all "huffy" over this statement, hear me
out. Python is the best language in the world. But it damn sure has
some warts! "len(this)" instead of "obj.length" max(that) instead of
[1,2,3,4,5].max(). You know what i am talking about here people. We
all get complacent and It seems easier to just cope with these
problems instead of fighting for change. But look at the French, WHAT
THE HELL HAS THAT DONE FOR THEM, *NOTHING*!!!!
+0.6
or better [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].len or [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].max
What has this got to do with "true OOP"?
[snip]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
