MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> writes: > So it complains about: > > ++(RE_CHAR*)context->text_ptr > > but not about: > > ++info->repeat.count > > Does this mean that the gcc compiler thinks that the cast makes it an > rvalue?
The cast operator does return an rvalue, treating it otherwise used to be an extension to popular compilers, including ironically gcc. The standard-compliant way of writing the above would be: ++ *(RE_CHAR **) &context->text_ptr -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
