On 10:00 pm, t...@urandom.ca wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 21:53 +0000, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
I specifically left out all "yield" statements in my version, since
that's exactly the point here. :) With "real" coroutines, they're not
necessary - coroutine calls look just like any other call. With
Python's enhanced generators, they are.
Yes, I take your point.
Explicitly yielding may not be such a terrible thing, though. It's
more
clear when reading such code where it may return back to the scheduler.
This may be important for performance, unless of course the coroutine
implementation supports preemption.
Sure, no value judgement intended, except on the practice of taking
words with well established meanings and re-using them for something
else ;)
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
