Ole Streicher wrote: > Hello Peter, > > Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> writes: >>> What I want is to have a universal class that "always" works: with >>> unbound functions, with bound function, with lambda expressions, with >>> locally defined functions, > >> That's left as an exercise to the reader ;) > > Do you have the feeling that there exists any reader that is able to > solve this exercise? :-)
I was thinking of you. > I am a bit surprised that already such a simple problem is virtually > unsolvable in python. Do you think that my concept of having a DoAsync > class is wrong? I don't understand the example you give in the other post. If you are trying to use reference counting as a means of inter-thread communication, then yes, I think that's a bad idea. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
