Well, as sometimes happens, the response to Dennis' response caught my attention (out of context) and I didn't notice Dennis' response! Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I will look at it tonight, and follow-up tomorrow after I've had a chance to digest it and work with it. (And thank you Dennis!) V
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Hansen <apt.shan...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Victor Subervi <victorsube...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hmm. I didn't bother to look at the "comparison post". The indenting looks >> right to me. I reread my post and I believe my question is straight-forward. >> The crux of the issue is my sentence at the bottom. I believe that details >> what my objective is. Not sure what I should do here. I hope you can clarify >> what it is you want me to clarify. >> > > He was complaining not about your post but a rather extended response > Dennis made to you while trying to help. Which is a particularly asshatish > thing to do, but hey. > > Dennis's response isn't really my style of using SQL in Python, but its > perfectly legible and understandable -- both in GMail where I usually read, > and via the link r provided to prove his point, which it doesn't at all. It > looks fine in both. > > Either way, I basically do it just the same way Dennis did-- so did that > solve your question? A little bit of table redesign and then recursive calls > between the "items" and "relationships" tables. > > --S > > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list