On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > Austin Bingham wrote: > I'm feeling really dense about now... What am I missing?
What you're missing is the entire discussion up to this point. I was looking for a way to use an alternative uniqueness criteria in a set instance without needing to modify my class. > So is that the behavior you're wanting, keeping the first object and > discarding all others? Or is there something else I'm still missing? Yes and yes. I want "normal" set behavior, but I want the set to use user-provided hash and equality tests, i.e. ones that don't necessarily call __hash__ and __eq__ on the candidate elements. Austin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
