Thanks, Rami, that will work. V On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Albert Hopkins <mar...@letterboxes.org>wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 20:34 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Fixing ‘time’, ‘datetime’, and ‘calendar’ was the reason for Python 3? > > No, it wasn't. > > > > Or perhaps you mean that any backward-incompatible change was a reason > > to have Python 3? Even more firmly no. The extent of changes was > > severely limited to make the transition from Python 2 to Python 3 as > > painless as feasible, while still meeting the goals of Python 3. > > No, I meant "cleaning up the standard library in spite of > incompatibilities" was one of the goals of Python3 (PEP 3108). > Personally I don't see anything wrong with the modules, but that was my > question to the person who said they should all be integrated but wasn't > because of incompatibilities. > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
