En Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:51:04 -0300, Steven D'Aprano <st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> escribió:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:34:19 -0300, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:54:15 -0300, Steven D'Aprano escribió:

Shadowing a standard library module
is no different.

But that's what namespaces are for; if the standard library had its own
namespace, such collisions would not occur.

Sure. But that's not a bug in the import system. If it's a bug, it's a
bug in the layout of the standard library.

Half and half? The standard library cannot have a different structure because the import system cannot handle it in a backgwards compatible way?

--
Gabriel Genellina

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to