On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:07 PM, mk <mrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Steven D'Aprano wrote: >> >> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:29:07 +0100, mk wrote: >> >>> Ethan Furman wrote: >>> >>>> http://www1.american.edu/academic.depts/cas/econ/faculty/isaac/ >> >> choose_python.pdf >>>> >>> Choose to get your difficult questions about threads in Python ignored. >>> Oh well.. >> >> With an attitude like that, you're damn lucky if you don't get kill- >> filed. It was SIX MINUTES since you posted your question about timers, >> what did you expect? > > I didn't expect immediate answer to this particular question. I have > repeatedly asked many questions about threads in the past, and IIRC every > one of them was ignored. > >> >> Threads are hard, and many people don't use them at all. You might never >> get an answer, even without alienating people. Complaining after six DAYS >> might be acceptable, if you do it with a sense of humour, but after six >> minutes? > > Well, it's 4 days now. I would be happy to get 50% response rate. Apparently > nobody is really using threads. > > regards, > mk
I use threads. Geremy Condra -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list