On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin P. Hellwig wrote: >> Well even if this statement would be true, I personally think that not >> proclaiming something a 'standard' if you are sure that you are not sure >> about it, is a virtue. > > In terms of trying too hard to achieve perfection, am I missing a > Python repository similar to the C++ Boost project? All the nice-to- > have classes that extend the core of C++ get to live in Boost before > the C++ Committee pulls the best ideas off the top and add them to the > Standard Library...
The next closest thing would probably be the Python Cookbook: http://code.activestate.com/recipes/langs/python/ However, such stuff can also be found as third-party modules. Cheers, Chris -- http://blog.rebertia.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list