Christopher J. Bottaro wrote: > [...]
> Cuz I think the Language Reference is really more of a grammer reference and > far too technical to look up simple things like "how to declare a > function". > > I guess what I'm trying to say is that there is no manual (for the language > itself, not the modules). There is just the tutorial that serves as the > manual. I think it should evolve into a manual that is more comprehensive > and organized more like other programming manuals (chapter on control > structures, functions, classes, inheritance, etc). Fair enough. An 'upgraded' tutorial that would include simple discussion on some 'advanced topics' could be helpful. For example, there is (almost) no reference to the new-style classes inside the tutorial, the "yield" keyword and generator stuff is described in half a page, etc. SB -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
