Thank you Rubin! Let me have a look at Judy. It seems good at first glance.
-- ShenLei 2010/3/25 Paul Rubin <no.em...@nospam.invalid>: > 甜瓜 <littlesweetme...@gmail.com> writes: >> Well, Database is not proper because 1. the table is very big (~10^9 >> rows) 2. we should support very fast *simple* query that is to get >> value corresponding to single key (~10^7 queries / second). > > Just one numeric key/value pair in each row? What's wrong with > universal hashing? > > PyJudy might also be of interest: > http://www.dalkescientific.com/Python/PyJudy.html > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list