On Apr 6, 11:05 am, AlienBaby <matt.j.war...@gmail.com> wrote: > The requirement for a commercial license comes down to being > restricted to not using any open source code. If it's an open source > license it can't be used in our context.
You may be misunderstanding this issue, I think you are equating "open source" with "GPL", which is the open source license that requires applications that use it to also open their source. There are many other open source licenses, such as Berkeley, MIT, and LGPL, that are more permissive in what they allow, up to and in some cases including full inclusion within a closed-source commercial product. You might also contact the supplier of the open source code you are interested, and perhaps pay a modest fee to obtain a commercial license. -- Paul -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
