On Apr 12, 9:26 pm, Steven D'Aprano <ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> # The obfuscated, fragile way > map( itemgetter(0), sorted( > zip(db, range(1, len(db)+1)), key=lambda t: t[1] if t[1] in i else -1 > )[-len(i):] ) I have to hand it to you that this might, in fact, be "the" obfuscated, fragile way, but I gotta tell you that I'm certain there exist other ways that are considerably less obfuscated and considerably less fragile that I, personally would still consider to be obfuscated and fragile... The only thing you get points off for is the lack of a multiply or divide by 10. The original data set is just crying out for such a thing, and, while it might not do all that much for the obfuscation, it would certainly help with the fragility. ;-) Regards, Pat -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
