In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Curiously I had the same problem just the other day, except with list >instead of string. I think the problem is that the sections on the >actual built-in types (list, str, dict, etc.) are one level too far >down to appear in the table of contents of the Library Reference. > >If things could be rearranged so that their names actually appeared in >the table of contents, I think it would make a big difference in this >area.
There should be a doc bug I submitted that covers that, but I don't have time to look for it. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "And if that makes me an elitist...I couldn't be happier." --JMS -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
