Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Are you implying that by distributing your libraries under the MIT or Apache licence, no linking is required? That's a cool trick, can you explain how it works please?
Err.. Linking statically with library in question? Which excludes LGPL for legal reasons and doesn't exclude MIT/Apache license for legal reasons?
(this is obviously orthogonal to a technical question why static linking should be used sparringly if at all)
Regards, mk -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
