* 2010-05-15 09:42 (-0700), travis wrote:
> PS: Why do people call LISP object-oriented? Are they smoking crack?
> No classes, no methods, no member variables... WTF?
Maybe because Common Lisp has a strong support for object-oriented
programming.
Peter Seibel: Practical Common Lisp
Generic functions and methods (chapter 16)
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/object-reorientation-generic-functions.html
Classes (chapter 17)
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/object-reorientation-classes.html
Paul Graham: On Lisp
Object-Oriented Lisp (chapter 25)
http://www.bookshelf.jp/texi/onlisp/onlisp_26.html#SEC156
Wikipedia: Common Lisp Object System
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp_Object_System
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
