On 06/18/10 19:19, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
> Deadly Dirk wrote:
>> I cannot get right the super() function:
>> Python 3.1.1+ (r311:74480, Nov 2 2009, 14:49:22) [GCC 4.4.1] on linux2
>> Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information.
>> ==== No Subprocess ====
>>
>>>>> class P:
>>>>>
>> def __init__(__class__,self):
>> print("I am a member of class P")
>>
>>
>>>>> class C(P):
>>>>>
>> def __init__(self):
>> super().__init__(self)
>> print("I am a member of class C")
>>
>>
>> class P:
>> def __init__(self):
>> print("I am a member of class P")
>>
>> class C(P):
>> def __init__(self):
>> super().__init__(self)
>> print("I am a member of class C")
>>
>> x=C()
>>
>> That is more or less the text from the "Quick Python Book". What am I
>> doing wrong?
>>
>>
> If you're quite new to Python I would advise to drop super and use an
> explicit call, sounds lame but my guess is that many people do that,
> 'cause explicit >> implicit. Super is meant to solve some issues about
> multi inheritance, especially diamond diagram inheritance. It has no
> benefit for single inheritance.
Actually there is. If you need to anticipate the possibility of someone
else (or you in the future) multiply-inheriting from your
singly-inheriting class, then your singly-inheriting class would need to
use super as well, otherwise the multiply-inheriting class might not be
properly initialized.
> I'm pretty sure someone will state that understanding super is pretty
> much easy once you've read the documenation but anticipating all the
> underlying concepts may be tricky. The only situation where super is
> absolutely required is when the inheritance diagram is built dynamically
> during execution.
> Otherwise, I would say "Have the nuts to explicit which base class
> method you want to call" (easy for single inheritance though :) )
>
> class C(P):
> def __init__(self):
> P.__init__(self)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
