On Jul 4, 1:31 am, jmfauth <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Python all versions. > > It's not a bug, but I'm suprised the following does > not raise a SyntaxError (missing space between > '9' and 'for'). > > >>> [9for c in 'abc'] > [9, 9, 9]
It does seem strange that Python's lexer wouldn't consider 9for as a single token. Even tough it's not a valid token in Python, your eye kind of sees it as one, so wouldn't it be better to raise a syntax error? Some other places were keyword can follow a number: 9if 0 else 1 (but not "9if 0else 1") 9and 0 9or 0 9in (1,2,3) 9is None > Side effect: If this behaviour is considered as correct, > it makes a correct Python code styling (IDLE, editors, ...) > practically impossible to realise. I'm not sure why an odd corner of the grammar would mess the whole thing up. Most code stylers only approximate the actual grammar anyway. Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
