Mike Meyer wrote: > Basically, there's a *lot* of history in programming languages. I'd > hate to see someone think that we went straight from assembler to C, > or that people didn't understand the value of dynamic languages very > early.
Yes, although I wasn't following historical events; I was following the trends of what programmers in general have used. Theory has always been far ahead of practice... and generalizations are never correct. ;-) Shane -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
