Also sprach alex goldman: > Tassilo v. Parseval wrote:
>> Most often, languages with strong typing can be found on the functional >> front (such as ML and Haskell). These languages have a dynamic typing >> system. > > No, ML & Haskell are strongly and statically typed. Read this paper if > interested: You're right, their type system is in fact static. To me they never had a very static feel though which is why I get their classification wrong most of the time. LISP would have been an example for strongly and dynamically typed. Tassilo -- use bigint; $n=71423350343770280161397026330337371139054411854220053437565440; $m=-8,;;$_=$n&(0xff)<<$m,,$_>>=$m,,print+chr,,while(($m+=8)<=200); -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list